Bob's Soundtrack

Share

One Year Ends... (A New Year's Thoughts)

And thus ends another year, slowly and quietly, and here in Newfoundland, a bit on the chilly side. No one is in much of a hurry around here in the post Christmas hangover, - January is a slow month in St. John’s. And thus my attempts to update this journal in any remotely timely fashion get harder and harder.

In the media I follow, it is the time of year-end lists and whatnot. I started to write this entry a good while ago, with just such an idea, and then immediately realized it was the act of the lazy and cynical. In my journalism days we would mock such lists for what they were - an easy way for our columnists to recycle their previous work. And anyway, what would I write on such a list? I would be lucky to find five new songs I heard this year that stayed with me for more then ten minutes. I saw a handful of shows, and left most of them dissatisfied for one reason or another. After starting this entry and abandoning it a dozen times, I am feeling like I may have written myself into a corner. The original idea of this blog was to use songs and music I like as a platform to discuss the band, its music, and everything else that made sense. Having written some 50 of these small essays now, the ‘everything else’ has gotten more interesting to me than the songs themselves. Or perhaps I am on the wrong track altogether.

One song I have listened to more than most recently was ‘Suzanne’, by Leonard Cohen, a song I first heard over 20 years ago. The reason I came back to it was watching Cohen himself do it live. That was over a year ago, and yet I cannot stop thinking about the song and his performance of it. For years, ‘Suzanne’ and the early greatest hits collection it appeared on has been a guilty pleasure of mine. In my university days I aspired to that same sort of mysterious poetic intellectual drunkard persona Cohen cultivated so well in the 70s, and his lyrics spoke to me at every level.  I was a bit reluctant to see him play, actually - I did not want that memory ruined by a shit rendition. At the last second I decided to use my ticket, and bailed on a studio session to catch the second act of one of his St. John’s shows. ‘Suzanne’ was the second song I caught, and I was instantly relieved. Cohen was utterly convincing. He has lived every syllable of his words and music, and offers wisdom and acceptance to go with his considerable gift for melody.  The song had changed immeasurably in his skilled hands, yet it was still perfect. And in fact, seeing the great man perform it live really changed the way I have listened to any song from then on. I have spent a year thinking about this, and trying to put the conclusion into something useful.

In a way, my efforts on the last tour with the solos kind of did the same thing. Granted some songs worked better than others, but it was an interesting learning experience. The idea was to force an element of musical spontaneity into every show, especially those nights when we might have just gone with the familiar and known. When you are out there by yourself, (a couple of times without even the benefit of an instrument), it really does depend on your delivery of the lyric and the melody. Without the crutch of arrangement and rhythm and hooks and whatnot, you really do have to offer a performance that comes from the heart. That statement is weighted with cliché, but you just don’t have anything else. Everything Cohen sang was like that, and I am envious.

The recent death of Ronnie Drew, a singer I love, sent me into the depths of youtube, where dozens of videos of his huge catalogue exist. There was a man who lived and loved every word and note he sang. Like Cohen, his voice was limited and eccentric, yet he conveyed a passion and emotion that shone through even the most dire of arrangements and circumstances.

I am slowly coming to believe that my efforts to hear and learn new music all the time may be a bit misguided. Cohen has been singing the same 30 songs for a lifetime, but yet his audience drank them in like a good French red wine, one that has the capacity to be different with every sip. He has the ability to fine-tune the meaning of each note and phrase, to paint the same picture from many different angles, with many different colours. Ronnie Drew had the same quality, an uncanny ability to sing a song and make it flow like a good novel, one you can read over and over again, always finding something new. Thinking back to the solos we played on the last tour, the ones that worked the best had little to do with their musical merit or relevance to the audience at hand, and more to do with the passion and meaning (and even humour) we were able to put into them.

That, I have come to believe is the lesson of Cohen and Drew. Perhaps I should cease to search for the new, and instead really learn the songs I already know.

Either that, or start writing about books and wine.

Published Wednesday, January 14, 2009 12:38 PM by nicopop
Filed Under:

Comments

 

james barnes said:

Bob.   Heres and idea that you might like and may be a bit hard to do.  If you had to make a compelation of the greatest songs of newfoundland music what would you put on it.  Maybe a few songs from Harry Hibbs, The Doreymen?  or maybe even some of Ray Johnson's songs.
January 14, 2009 1:30 PM
 

annathepiper said:

Hi Bob,

I've dropped this comment on recent posts by Alan and I wanted to say it here too--thank you, very very much, for doing the solo bits on the recent tour. They do indeed bring spontaneity to the shows. But they also give us fans a great chance to see Kris, Murray, and *you* get moments in the spotlight. You've had more of those of course singing lead on recent songs, but it's great to have a chance at seeing Kris and Murray take lead on something too.

I mention this to tie into what you're saying about going over songs you already know and lavishing attention on them so that you get a different performance each time. There's definitely value in that. I daresay that this is one of the many reasons we all come back to see you guys year after year. Sure, we all know "General Taylor" and "Lukey" backwards and forwards by now. ;) But each time you do it, it's a different experience. You bring different energy to the stage in every performance. Those of us in the audience bring different energy to hurl right back at you. Each time is its own unique experience.

On the other hand, as all those solo spots at the recent shows prove, there's great value in new musical experiences too. Certainly for us fans, and I'm just enough of a musician myself to suspect that even hands much more seasoned than mine on a guitar will appreciate a chance to learn something new.

Thanks for a great and thought-provoking post. :)
January 14, 2009 1:38 PM
 

TinaMack said:

I love this entry. To say more is to say less. (Trust me. I've been trying for 10 minutes.) Looking forward to more of whatever GBS can uncork in 09. Cheers.
January 14, 2009 2:47 PM
 

Alex said:

Bob-

This is probably one of your more insightful posts in the past year. I would argue that you have hit the nail right on the head. GBS's last album was sorely lacking in that greater understanding that comes from playing the same tune, over and over, through different arrangements, etc. Instead the album came off as rushed, over produced, tired even... and all at the expense of the songs.

Listening to GBS live is an experience second to none. Capturing that in a recording is hard, for sure... but there is no studio recording that can compete with what you do live. There is far more humor, irony, sweat, frustration and fun in your performances in front of an audience... perhaps because there's no net. Perhaps that element of risk is what pushes you over the edge of giving 100%... that mysterious element.

In any event, even with my frustrations, we'll keep buying GBS cds with the hope that that ephemeral connection, that passion and fury will be captured on the next one.

cheers
January 14, 2009 2:50 PM
 

saxygirlnyc said:

Well, I did have a really well-written and insightful post but Internet Explorer decided to crap out on me.  Let me try to recreate...

I'm facing a similar conundrum with my band.  We've been asked to prepare two new pieces and revive three pieces from a previous performance for a special gig at Carnegie Hall next month.

I'm finding it pretty easy and enjoyable to fine-tune and add more umph to some of our previously played songs while it's like pulling teeth to have to rehearse the others.  It's hit or miss with the new ones too.  For that reason, I don't think it's so much whether the piece is new as opposed to whether or not you love it. If you really connect to a song and enjoy playing it then any passion you put into it will be apparent.  If it's "just another song" and you force yourself to rework it, it will be a train-wreck.

I guess the moral is: Love what you do. If you're not enjoying yourself with a piece, it's gonna show.  

Musically yours,
Amy
January 14, 2009 3:39 PM
 

squeezeboxsarah said:

I remember one of your past entries wherein someone accused you of being self-centered in your journal, probably expecting a rebuttal.  You replied that journal writing is a naturally self-centered endeavor and did not contest the reader’s comment.  I began keeping a semi-regular blog on MySpace a few months ago, seeing it as an opportunity to write for fun and reflect on particularly emotional things that happen to me, good (Great Big Sea) and bad (falling off a horse for the first time) in a place where people may or may not read and may or may not give me feedback.  Being a longtime fan of journalist Dave Barry, I aim to entertain my regular readers (all three of them), though deep down I recognize that I don’t really write for them, I write for me.
I found myself recently in the same situation you write about here, wherein I realized that reviewing the year and relate my triumphs and losses and other such rigmarole was boring and predictable and, as you pointed out, kind of cheap.
You're writing for you.  I know we sometimes get antsy waiting on you and Alan, the same way we wish you would come back to Ohio even though we saw you at two of the three shows you treated us to here last fall and we know we shouldn't be so greedy and demanding.  Continue writing for you, at your own pace, and we will continue to read.
Speaking of which, I would love to read a discourse on books and wine.  Or take a page from Sean and Alan's books and write about your dog.
Also suffering seriously sub-arctic temperatures here in NE Ohio - being at the barn for class at 7:30 in the morning is a killer.
Stay warm. : )
January 14, 2009 4:18 PM
 

MariaB said:

Thanks for an authentic reflection on songwriting and performing. I enjoyed many of your performances this year the last at Nokia blew me away. Have a great 2009 and don't miss The Carolina Chocolate Drops at Merlefest in NC. Wish I could be there but they don't let teachers take vacation days when there is no school vacation. All the best to you all.
January 14, 2009 6:28 PM
 

mairzydotes said:

Bob, why one and not both?  
Don’t you think that it’s sometimes in the exploration of the new that we are driven to go back and revisit what we already know and love, and maybe rethink it in greater depth?  Whether it be music, literature, wine, the spouse (*snort*), it seems to be when you’re breaking new ground that you can also open yourself up to new ideas about what you’ve ‘known’ forever.  Just a thought.

Mare
January 14, 2009 6:39 PM
 

marikochurst said:

Hi Bob!!

Thank you for a fantastic post! I am (like TinaMack), looking forward to what Great Big Sea "uncorks" this year! I love wine & books, great things on this Earth.

As for your post? Great one! I look forward to reading your entries, as well as Alan's FTRs when they appear. GreatBigSea.com is my homepage, plus the mailing list. I hope you'll be back in Southern Ontario (Hamilton, Niagara & the like) soon!!

Great shows!! A wonderful 2009 to you & yours.

Mariko
January 14, 2009 9:50 PM
 

L said:

You're the one who has repeatedly (and appropriately) noted the need for seeing music in its proper context. Cohen's Holy Heart show (which was indeed splendid) also should be seen in such context, and so does the audience's response to that show.

This tour was Cohen's first in 15 years, so while he has been performing the same 30 or so songs for a (professional) lifetime, a substantial amount of time has passed since the people who have come to love those songs have had the opportunity to see them performed live, and at this show (and on the subsequent tour) many were seeing that happen for the first time ever.

It was a powerful, passionate performance (appreciably more powerful and passionate a performance than the one I saw him do almost 20 years ago), and he did indeed perform his songs with a passion and subtlety that made each song feel fresh and brand new...but the fact still remains that these songs were quite literally "fresh and brand new" in their live versions to nearly everyone in the audience, by simple virtue of none of us having seen those live versions performed in at least a decade and a half, if ever.

Maybe it would be possible to keep those same 30 songs feeling equally fresh and brand new over the course of years of consecutive tours. Leonard Cohen is probably among that very small group of entertainers who might be able to do this, and his songs are full and rich enough, deep and subtle enough - true enough - for many such revisitations.

But it seems equally if not more likely that as time passed and those same songs were performed again and again - even if they were performed every time with brilliant passion and keen subtlety - in each town at each subesquent show, the awe and the wonder would gradually diminish in the face of familiarity and expectation. Eventually, the audience would likely be largely made up of a group of regulars who come to the show for the explicit purpose of hearing everything they've already heard before, everything they hear each time they come. Not necessarily a bad thing in and of itself, but considerably different from the electric energy that crackled and sizzled in the Holy Heart Of Mary.

Why see it in either/or terms? Why not learn to fully express the passion and subtleties of the songs you already know, while still searching for, creating, and expressing the passion and subtleties of the new? Why not an approach wide open enough (and big-hearted enough) to encompass both?

Sorry if pointing out the context thing pisses you off; I hope not - after all, I did learn to see music that way largely from you. By the way, this was one of your best journal entries. So far.

January 14, 2009 11:01 PM
 

seaworthy said:

A song is a song..or sometimes is it just a song? I have to agree that it's the performers interpretation that makes the song. Colcannon performed by anyone else would seem trite to me. You gave a pot of veggies alot of flavor (pun intended). I remember in one of your past post you were discussing how Tull had diminished in your eyes after they were so relevent in your youth. I think it all stems from where you were and who you were when you heard the tune,or lyrics, hooks, what have you. Searching for the greatest song is like searching foe the Holy Grail. Does it truely exist or does it exist in a fleeting moment only ? The point, I think, is to enjoy it while you can.
As for being a mysteriuos, poetic, intellectual drunkard...well I wonder if Cohen thought of himself in that way or if Drew thought he was passionate at all. Lincoln's Gettysburg address was one of the most profound speeches ever written..he thought it sucked. Do you think of yourself the way we your fans think of you ?
Nice post Bob. Keep going.
January 15, 2009 10:08 AM
 

Heidi said:

I loved this entry because it gave us a glimpse into what you really feel about music. Keep writing about the things that inspire you, not necessarily to impress others (you will succeed at that either way). If writing about "books and wine" is what you want to reflect upon, then do it. I also loved the solo's this year, they were a pleasant surprise. The song you performed in Thunder Bay was very inspiring, honest and heat felt. You are all doing a wonderful job.
Cheers!
January 15, 2009 10:25 AM
 

bzjennyb said:

Bob - I agree whole heartedly with your closing statement "Perhaps I should cease to search for the new, and instead really learn the songs I already know."

There are so many songs recorded and written by you b'ys over the years that are poignant and impactful... sometimes in their simplicity... other times in the emotion that is drawn out from them.

Unfortunately, those songs often take back seat to the upbeat crowd pleasers that are performed in the majority of the live shows... (without complaint as I myself love a chance at a rip-roarin dance during a concert).

However... some of my favorite tunes - and ones I am trying to convince my hubby to cover in his performances - don't receive the spotlight that they deserve in my opinion
How Did We Get From Sayin I love You, Lucky Me, Let It Go, Nothin out of Nothin, Fast As I Can... and the list goes on.

There is some tremendous material in there that you already know that really hits home.
January 15, 2009 8:56 PM
 

AnneInPhilly said:

Bob,

I also enjoyed the solos this time around. I particularly enjoyed the intros to them also. And to hear you and Murray and Kris playing instruments you don't normally play in the solo spotlight was fun. Mr. Multi-Instrumentalist does not need an instrument to hold the audience in rapt attention. They really liked Colcannon from the get-go. The solo bits made the show "fresh."  A few years ago it seemed that the setlist was stuck in a rut. It didn't seem that way this tour. I particularly enjoy the "Evening With Great Big Sea" sets because they allow the band to do the slower tempo songs that a GA show does not lend itself to. Any time you guys want to reprise anything old, go ahead! You're 10-15 years older and bring so much more to the mix. And if you want to write about wine and/or books, go ahead! Your readership waits.
January 15, 2009 9:27 PM
 

Jenny said:

Hey Bob,
How about just some notes on wine?   I could use a new flavor or two to enjoy my GBS by!
Jenny

January 16, 2009 1:49 PM
 

kati1267 said:

Great one, Bob.  I really reading your blogs because they make me think - your writing style makes the reader want to keep reading, regardless of the topic.  When you touch on stories of your youth, some us who not regrettably at all are in the same age bracket can also recall our own musical choices, our own angst of coming of age in the 80's (a contradictory time to say the least) and our own thoughts of trying to fit somewhere while retaining our individuality.  I never went to school dressed as Jesus, but my hair saw every color of the rainbow and stood about 6 inches off my head - yeah, my mother cried too.  

Hearing about your musical influences in such a personal manner is just as it should be.  Honestly, going back, probably my favorite entry was when you described how you listened to Altan in your head when you were recovering from meningitis.  That one hit me hard, as there are times in my life where I was places where music wasn't available and I had to listen to whatever my memory could dredge up - almost always more interesting choices than if I could go through the cd collection.

Cheers and keep writing!

Kati
January 17, 2009 6:38 AM
 

Roz said:

Oh no...Leonard Cohen again.  I SO wish I got it.  My husband tells me that appreciating LC requires a certain gene (which I am obviously lacking).  I do like the poetry though.  Maybe if someone else did the singing...

The solo thing was a great idea.  Brave.  
Peace.
January 17, 2009 12:04 PM
 

BeneMach said:

Greetings Bob and fellow GBS fans

Thanks for the introspection and the integrity. It matters.

I’ve only had the privilege of attending one GBS show. And while I found it to be inspirational, it did not really change my life. But it did shake me up, or wake me up, and it afforded me the opportunity to gain some visceral perspectives into my temporary disposition, and a glimpse into the grace of hope and the resilience of optimism.

I suppose we’re all on some form of quest, and occasionally, and if/when we’re fortunate, we can gain some insights into even the arcane workings of our hearts and minds. Sometimes, even while we think we’re wandering aimlessly, we can still be making progress. Perhaps stumbling through our own Northwest Passage(s) – albeit with hunches to intrigue rather than charts to guide us. And through this journey, we can learn some ideas or lessons, in both familiar and unusual places.

As a complete aside, I could suggest that your stomping grounds of “The Rock” might be as far away from “The Strip” as you can get. But, and perhaps ironically, your remarks may echo the sentiments expressed in an event program in Las Vegas.

With apologies to legal folks for quoting this, and to other readers for the length, here is what Franco Dragone (the writer and director of “O”) notes in the introduction programme.

“Since the beginning of time, there have been hallowed places where people gather to explain the universe. For me, the theatre is just such a place: sacred, magnificent and essential.  
“O” is an homage to Theatre … to every story ever born on its stage. Stories of great and of little importance, stories of life, love and death.
I’m convinced that the shows I direct already exist in some form somewhere and that my work consists of finding the path to their awakening.
At first, the story takes root in the minds of the concept designers, gradually inhabiting the artists and technicians. The story seems to be seeking a path towards us, as much as we seek a path towards it.
Then finally, the stage shudders to life. And the story tells itself, in its own language. … At last, it has found a path to you, the spectator.
Ladies and Gentlemen, bonne soiree.

While the show that follows is precisely choreographed, performed twice a night, most days of the year, it nonetheless remains truly spectacular. And the audience members do not mind if its almost identical, or if its been playing for years, because it is great. Not spontaneous, but still remarkable.  

And what is equally remarkable, at least for me, is that I believe Great Big Sea channels or accomplishes this same result. However, perhaps you do it with music or concerts or tours, instead of the theatre.

Rambling just a little bit more, someone smart said something like, our quest is not just to seek new worlds, but eventually, to return home, and to see our old world again, or for the first time, as if we're seeing it through a new set of eyes. (Apologies here, I could not find the quote. Any clarifications will be appreciated.)  

I mention these items because I think you deserve credit, and I’d venture to say that you deserve more credit than you’re giving yourself.  Alternately, perhaps more bluntly, what I’m trying to say is that I’m proud of you. And I respect your judgement. And I will be pleased and delighted to listen to any verse, or to follow most-any map, that you can recommend. Because whether its new or old, or whether its some story or melody that has existed forever or for years ago or that’s just found its way to you OR through you now, I will value hearing about it. Because it contains the truth.

I commend you on blazing trails and sharing hope. But I also commend or congratulate you on having the courage to visit or to revisit some more familiar places or locales, anew or again. Because whether you realise it or not, the experience or insights or maps or charts will be new to the rest of us. And, if we’re truly lucky, your efforts to revisit these places may even enable you to share some new insights, gained as it were through a new set of eyes, as you detect or grasp something even more profound.

They say that in Taoism “the way” is both a path and a method. As you continue on your journey, I look forward to hearing about your memories and your discoveries. And I will be pleased to learn or revisit melodic truths – from the rock or the strip – provided they have some typical GBS elements, much like Bob Marley would have called “redemption songs … songs of freedom”.

Time to sign off before I’m banned from posting these rants. All the best to the GBS band and global fan-base for 2009 and thanks for listening. Perhaps the root word for Fortune is the Latin Fortiter! Here’s hoping. And, in case others think me a gullible fool, I find the content and the material included on this board to be excellent, and I'm learning from you GBS fans too. Thanks for sharing.
January 20, 2009 4:14 AM
 

TerBear said:

I am a newbie to GBS, but I've already come to appreciate the talent that makes the band what it is. The love of music is evident, the talent that makes the music is undeniable. The more I learn of the "boys" in the band, the more impressed I've become. Not every band can perform a capella and sound incredible--you do.

That being said, Bob, follow your heart. You can't force inspiration. If you try, you will miss the mark. Your blogs indicate an intelligent and wise soul. Listen and you will know which fork in the road you want to take. There is no saying that you can't take a crossroad now and then, though.  :-)  

Do what you love and the rest will fall into place.


Completely different note: The joy that goes into your music reminds me of a band from Texas. Blues inspired by Bo Diddley. You can watch the lead singer and know that he absolutely loves what he does.  HamiltonLoomis.com if you're interested or just need a break!
January 23, 2009 2:58 PM
 

Caleb said:

This is a super random and completely unrelated topic (sorry for going off topic!), but I really am trying to find a copy of Janelle Dupuis's album (Yes, I will pay good money for one!) but I have been unable to find it, as her website appears to be dead.

Since Bob was the one to introduce her to me via this blog, I hope I can come here and ask for help from Bob or various GBS fans in finding this! Thanks! If you can help me find one, or if you know a better place for me to ask this (sorry again for hijacking a blog comment), toss me an email at darthquady --AT-- gmail --DOT-- COM
Thanks again!
January 25, 2009 10:58 PM
 

art4m said:

Bring on the books and wine, two of my favorite companions!

I would agree that seeking the new is to grow. Your perspective, as an example, brought a new reflection to me regarding the song Suzanne. Hence growth in new perspective. That is what gives longevity to songs.

Some GBS songs have been about for hundreds of years, yet here we are, with your voice and perspective, still dancing and singing to them.

If 'the everything else' strikes a cord, don't hesitate to share. You never know where it could lead..

Looking forward to the exploration..See you on S&DV! (book, wine, Ipod in hand).



January 26, 2009 9:11 AM
 

katfairy said:

Always good to see people appreciating Cohen.  I'm a semi-fan, myself- I love his work, but his voice just grates on my ears.  But, hey, that's just me.  Still, searching for covers has led me to some interesting places- Sting and The Chieftains doing "Sisters of Mercy", Willie Nelson's version of "Bird On A Wire", and the multiple versions of "Hallelujah" ranging from ohdeargods to ...wow.  I went to a concert this past semester with a Scottish musician playing acoustic guitar who closed his show with the single most breathtaking version of "Hallelujah" I've ever heard.  (Craig Mathieson, FTR.)

As for your blog, well, it is your blog.  Write what you like.  It will be worth reading whether it's about music, books, wine, or the cute dog that just walked past the window.  It's one of the reasons I like GBS- you guys aren't "just" good musicians- you can WRITE.  (English teacher's kid- a lot of blogs make my brain hurt, so I treasure the ones that are actually good.)
January 26, 2009 3:33 PM
Anonymous comments are disabled. Please register or sign in to post a comment.
Launch Player Join The Great Big Sea Mailing List
Apr 3 Melbourne, Australia
Apr 5 Sydney, Australia
Apr 8 Byron Bay, Australia