A while ago, I was talking about the difference between the
way we make records, and the way they used to be made. The difference can be a
little hard for a layman to understand; after all, to most people, a song is a
song. Audio quality, as long as it is decent, is probably neither here nor
there.
Thus it may come as a bit of a surprise that so many older
audio critics hate Itunes (and Ipods). An MP3 is a compressed version of the
audio information available on a CD; and, it should be noted that Itunes is
just a sophisticated version of the MP3 format that has been around for a
decade or more. It is a black and white picture of something designed to be
listened to in colour. These days, a lot of musicians and engineers have grown
up familiar with the tight fizzy sound of an MP3. They are comfortable with it, and they take this reality
into account. More often than not, records made prior to the digital age suffer
the most in comparison. Three-inch tape could capture an enormous amount of
real audio information, aided heavily by the warm tube mics and solid state
pre-amps which were the only thing available in those days. That is why albums
cost so much to make thirty years ago. To do anything like a decent job
recording music, you needed a fortune in specialized equipment. I can record
and edit multi-track songs on my laptop, but the reality is, certain aspects of
the audio quality will never even approach the stuff made in the 1970s. While
recording platforms are infinitely cheaper and more sophisticated today, the
digital mics and preamps found in most studios cannot come close to the sound
offered by old solid state equipment.
This is not to say that the digital age has not been a boon
to recording. Simple computer programs and dirt cheap digital-audio interfaces
mean I can make very sophisticated recordings without the benefit of an
engineer or stduio. And I can do them for practically nothing. And so can
anyone else. This is a good thing. On the other hand, the infinite editing
possibilities offered by the digital platform can be problematic. When do you
stop? Especially when endless tinkering does not cost anything? While our
studio is a mix of digital and analog, it is not free. The first thing I do
with any new client is to underline the necessity of at some point stopping. We
always remind our clients that artists usually run out of money before they run
out of inspiration. No one ever listens, but we are sympathetic. We have
learned the hard way that endless tinkering does not makes for more interesting
records. In a digital age, it is the spaces between the notes, the burst of
energy, the sudden moment of passion that can make all the difference.
35 years ago, bands had no choice. You could not go back and
overdub your enthusiasm. Tape cost
a fortune, and studio time was rare and valuable. If the band was wobbly, the
record sucked. Interestingly, sometimes the band did indeed suck, and the
result was still brilliant. Recently I downloaded Living In The USA by the
Steve Miller Band. I heard the cut on classic radio, and it stayed with me. If
you listen to it on headphones, it perfectly illustrates the sea change that
has taken place in the past decade.
The song is a blues shuffle in that late 60’s San Francisco
style, complete with someconfusing hippie patriotism passing for lyrics. A squeaky
old Hammond organ and a truly crappy bass carry the hook, along with an
inordinate amount of noodly percussion, sloppy handclaps, and some honkin’
harmonica. Still, it has a great feel, all good vibes and happy grooves. Listen
to it again, and you start to hear a few things that really make it stand out
when you put it up against something from the past decade. For example, the
intro takes a full 50 seconds. These days, the radio edit would have you well
into the third chorus by this juncture. 20 seconds later, when you finally hear
the classic hook for the first time, the group half-heartedly bumbles into the
riff only to have the guitar silenced by an ungainly blast of feedback.
My favourite moment comes at 1:42; for some reason the
drummer comes fully unglued, falling a full beat behind the rest of the band.
He is forced to speed up to catch everyone else, skipping along like a novice soldier. A minute later, a 60s-style
breakdown is abandoned after a dozen bars when neither the bass, guitar or
drums can agree on who is supposed to be doing what. And for the final bonus: the unrehearsed
ad-lib that covers the wandering fade contains some faux calls for patriotism;
the last audible one?
“Somebody get me a cheeseburger!”
They don’t make them like that anymore. It just does not
work that way.